Try the political quiz

27 Replies

 @VOTADiscuss this answer...2yrs2Y

Yes

 @BCS7NCNIndependent from Agusan del Sur  agreed…1mo1MO

After asking multiple sites and combining and summarizing it altogether, this is the result. "No, CRISPR is not 100% safe, although it is widely recognized as a revolutionary technology with great therapeutic potential. While clinical trials have shown promising results in treating diseases like sickle cell and cancer, significant safety and technical challenges remain before it can be considered a fully safe and established medical tool."

 @BC6H64Mfrom Antique  agreed…2mos2MO

1. General Principles for Human Genetic Modification
1.1 Ethical Boundaries:
Genetic modification using CRISPR technology should be strictly prohibited for non-therapeutic purposes (e.g., enhancement of intelligence, physical traits, or cosmetic modifications).
Genetic modifications should focus solely on treating or preventing serious, life-threatening, or debilitating diseases.
1.2 Consent and Autonomy:
All individuals undergoing genetic modification must give informed consent (or parental consent for minors). This must include detailed information on potential risks, benefits, and long-ter…  Read more

 @VOTADiscuss this answer...2yrs2Y

 @VOTADiscuss this answer...7mos7MO

Yes, we should only use it to prevent diseases and disorders instead of altering physical appearances

 @BBFMWXSagreed…3mos3MO

For instance, there was a study in KAIST which showed that CRISPR was effective at taking down cancer cells. If this can be utilized on bigger cancers, this technology could do well in eradicating this tragic disease.

 @VOTADiscuss this answer...7mos7MO

No, people should be able to do whatever they want as long as its not harming anyone else

 @BCS7NCNIndependent from Agusan del Sur  disagreed…1mo1MO

Yes, they should regulate it, because CRISPR is a very new technology that still needs improvements, and as long it isn't proven 100% safe for use, it still needs regulations, because it is better to be sure than uncertain.

 @BC6H64Mfrom Antique  disagreed…2mos2MO

How could one be so sure that what they do will not affect anyone else? Government regulations regarding the usage of CRISPR for human modifications will at least ensure that future modifications be humane and fair, and the risk of accidental deaths and injuries be minimal.

 @VOTADiscuss this answer...7mos7MO

No, and the government should not interfere with the private sector

 @BC74XNFLiberaldisagreed…2mos2MO

The Goverment Should Have Total And Full Control Of CRISPR Technology It Must Not Fall On The Wrong Hands

 @BCDG95Xanswered…2mos2MO

Yes, but overall should not be too limiting. In fact, it should provide more options to individuals other than just strictly for preventing diseases and disorders, specifically for cosmetic purposes, granted that the technology and methods are proven safe. That's what regulation is for.

 @B7R7DR7Liberalfrom Benguet  answered…7mos7MO

Yes but with very heavy oversights and regulations for moral, ethical, and values.

 @B7JB6G2Liberalfrom Benguet  answered…8mos8MO

Yes but make sure there's no abuse within the government or the people

 @B7F5WQDfrom Mindoro Occidental  answered…8mos8MO

 @VOTADiscuss this answer...7mos7MO

Yes, we can always relax regulations later but can’t undo tragic outcomes from reckless use of new technologies

 @VOTAasked…2yrs2Y

Can you name a potential positive or negative impact on nature and ecosystems if gene editing were widely applied outside humans?

 @VOTAasked…2yrs2Y

What responsibility do you think we have to regulate how much technology like this is used in our society?

 @VOTAasked…2yrs2Y

Would you personally use gene editing to eliminate a potential health issue in yourself or your family?

 @VOTAasked…2yrs2Y

Could making genetic modifications increase social inequalities, or would it reduce them?

 @VOTAasked…2yrs2Y

How would you feel if someone edited their DNA to increase intelligence—fair game, or unfair advantage?

 @VOTAasked…2yrs2Y

Do you believe using science to extend human lifespan is more of an opportunity or a danger?

 @VOTAasked…2yrs2Y

Should parents be allowed to use this kind of technology to select specific traits for their unborn children?

 @VOTAasked…2yrs2Y

How do you feel about the idea of using technology to control future generations' traits or abilities?

 @VOTAasked…2yrs2Y

Do you think altering human genes to eliminate disease crosses an ethical line, or is it just the next step in human evolution?

 @VOTAasked…2yrs2Y

If you could change one genetic trait, what would it be and why?

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...