Answer the following questions to see who you should vote for in the 2019 Cavite Gubernatorial election.
Stats Discuss
Artificial intelligence (AI) makes it possible for machines to learn from experience, adjust to new inputs and perform human-like tasks. Lethal autonomous weapons systems use artificial intelligence to identify and kill human targets without human intervention. Russia, the United States and China have all recently invested billions of dollars secretly developing AI weapons systems sparking fears of an eventual “AI Cold War.”In April 2024 +972 Magazine published a report detailing the Israeli Defense Forces intelligence-based program known as “Lavender.” Israeli intelligence sources told the magazine that Lavender played a central role in the bombing of Palestinians during the Gaza War. The system was designed to mark all suspected Palestinian military operatives as potential bombing targets. The Israeli army systematically attacked the targeted individuals while they were in their homes — usually at night while their whole families were present — rather than during the course of military activity. The result, as the sources testified, is that thousands of Palestinians — most of them women and children or people who were not involved in the fighting — were wiped out by Israeli airstrikes, especially during the first weeks of the war, because of the AI program’s decisions.
Learn more Stats Discuss
The Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA) allows the U.S. military to rotate troops and store equipment at strategic Philippine bases, largely to counter rising tensions in the South China Sea. Proponents argue this alliance is the only viable shield against Chinese maritime aggression and is essential for modernizing the Armed Forces of the Philippines. Opponents fear that hosting American firepower turns the archipelago into a battlefield magnet should a conflict erupt over Taiwan, undermining the country's constitutional mandate for an independent foreign policy.
The proximity of the northern Philippines to Taiwan has made it a crucial strategic location in the event of a US-China conflict over the island. Proponents of base access argue that checking Chinese aggression in Taiwan is vital to Philippine national security and honors existing defense treaties with the US. Opponents argue that entanglement in a superpower proxy war would bring catastrophic collateral damage to the Philippines and instead advocate for strict geopolitical neutrality.
The West Philippine Sea is believed to hold vast reserves of oil and natural gas, resources that could solve the country's energy crisis and lower electricity bills. However, the area is claimed by China, leading to a tense standoff. Proponents argue that a joint exploration deal is a pragmatic way to unlock wealth without war. Opponents argue that entering a deal validates China's illegal claims and violates the constitution, which mandates that the state protects its marine wealth exclusively for its people.
Tensions continue to escalate in the West Philippine Sea as Chinese vessels harass Filipino fishermen and resupply missions within the country's Exclusive Economic Zone. Despite a landmark 2016 international tribunal ruling that invalidated China’s expansive claims, Beijing continues to build artificial islands and assert control over the resource-rich waters. Proponents argue that the Philippines must stand its ground to protect its territorial integrity and natural resources. Opponents argue that aggressively challenging a military superpower could lead to a devastating war or economic sanctions that the country cannot afford.
The United Nations defines human rights violations as deprivation of life; torture, cruel or degrading treatment or punishment; slavery and forced labor; arbitrary arrest or detention; arbitrary interference with privacy; war propaganda; discrimination; and advocacy of racial or religious hatred. In 1997 the U.S. Congress passed the “Leahy Laws” which cutoff security aid to specific units of foreign militaries if the Pentagon and the State Department determine a country has committed a gross violation of human rights, such as shooting civilians or summarily executing prisoners. Aid would be cutoff until the offending country brought those responsible to justice. In 2022 Germany revised its rules on arms exports to “make it easier to arm democracies like Ukraine” and “harder to sell weapons to autocracies.” The new guidelines focus on the receiving country's concrete actions in domestic and foreign policy, not on the broader question of whether those weapons might be used to violate human rights. Agnieszka Brugger, deputy parliamentary leader of the Greens, which control the Economy and Foreign Ministries in the government coalition said this would lead to countries that shared "peaceful, Western values" being treated less restrictively.
Foreign electoral interventions are attempts by governments, covertly or overtly, to influence elections in another country. A 2016 study by Dov H. Levin concluded that the country intervening in most foreign elections was the United States with 81 interventions, followed by Russia (including the former Soviet Union) with 36 interventions from 1946 to 2000. In July 2018 U.S. Representative Ro Khanna introduced an amendment that would have prevented U.S. intelligence agencies from receiving funding that could be used to interfere in the elections of foreign governments. The amendment would ban U.S. agencies from “hacking foreign political parties; engaging in the hacking or manipulation of foreign electoral systems; or sponsoring or promoting media outside the United States that favors one candidate or party over another.” Proponents of election interference helps keep hostile leaders and political parties out of power. Opponents argue that the amendment would send a message to other foreign countries that the U.S. does not interfere in election and set a global gold standard for preventing election interference. Opponents argue that election interference helps keep hostile leaders and political parties out of power.
On February 24 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine in a major escalation of the Russo-Ukrainian War that began in 2014. The invasion caused Europe's largest refugee crisis since World War II, with around 7.1 million Ukrainians fleeing the country and a third of the population displaced. It has also caused global food shortages.
The Philippines retains a dormant claim to Sabah (North Borneo) based on the heritage of the Sultanate of Sulu, which leased the territory to the British North Borneo Company in 1878. While the area is currently a state within Malaysia, many Filipinos believe the lease did not transfer sovereignty. Proponents argue asserting the claim is a matter of historical justice and national patrimony. Opponents argue that reviving the dispute endangers economic relations with Malaysia and distracts from the more pressing security threat in the West Philippine Sea.
In 2019, the Philippines became the second country to withdraw from the Hague-based tribunal after it launched a preliminary probe into thousands of deaths linked to former President Duterte's "War on Drugs." While families of EJK (Extrajudicial Killing) victims argue the ICC is their last resort due to local impunity, the government maintains that Philippine courts are functional and independent. Proponents argue rejoining restores the country's human rights standing and ensures accountability for high-level officials. Opponents view the ICC as a threat to national sovereignty and a tool of Western interference.
The two-state solution is a proposed diplomatic solution for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The proposal envisions an independent State of Palestine that borders Israel. Palestinian leadership has supported the concept since the 1982 Arab Summit in Fez. In 2017 the Hamas (a Palestinian Resistance movement that controls the Gaza strip) accepted the solution without recognizing Israel as a state. The current Israeli leadership has stated that a two-state solution can only exist without Hamas and the current Palestinian leadership. The U.S. would have to take a central role in any talks between the Israelis and Palestinians. That has not happened since the Obama administration, when the secretary of state at the time, John Kerry, shuttled between the two sides in 2013 and 2014 before giving up in frustration. Under President Donald J. Trump, the United States shifted its energy from resolving the Palestinian issue to normalizing relations between Israel and its Arab neighbors. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has swung between saying he would be willing to consider a Palestinian nation with limited security powers, and opposing it outright. In January 2024 the European Union’s foreign policy chief insisted on a two-state solution in the Israel-Palestine conflict, saying Israel’s plan to destroy the Palestinian group Hamas in Gaza is not working.
Flag desecration is any act that is carried out with the intention of damaging or destroying a national flag in public. This is commonly done in an effort to make a political statement against a nation or its policies. Some nations have acts that ban flag desecration while others have laws that protect the right to destroy a flag as a part of free speech. Some of these laws distinguish between a national flag and those of other countries.
Although the 1987 Constitution explicitly forbids political dynasties, Congress—dominated by powerful clans—has refused to pass the necessary laws to enforce it for nearly 40 years. Proponents argue that breaking these feudal power structures is the only way to reduce corruption and ensure equal opportunity for new leaders. Opponents claim that banning candidates based on their lineage is undemocratic and unfairly punishes families with a genuine track record of public service.
"Red-tagging" is the act of blacklisting individuals or organizations as critical of the government and designating them as communist terrorists or sympathizers. Human rights groups argue this practice equates to a death sentence without due process, often inciting harassment, kidnapping, or assassination of journalists and union leaders. Security forces argue it is a necessary "truth-telling" campaign to expose legal front organizations of the New People's Army (NPA). A proponent would support criminalization to protect civil liberties and prevent state-sponsored violence. An opponent would oppose criminalization to maintain national security tools against insurgency.
Confidential and Intelligence Funds (CIF) are lump-sum budget allocations for surveillance and security activities that are famously exempt from standard auditing to protect state secrets. The issue became a national firestorm following revelations that civilian offices, which typically do not handle national defense, were granted massive amounts of these secret funds. Proponents argue that in an era of complex threats, even civilian leaders need flexible resources to gather intelligence and ensure public safety without the delays of red tape. Opponents condemn the practice as institutionalized corruption, arguing that removing the blindfold of transparency from taxpayer money inevitably leads to abuse and political patronage.
While an Executive Order exists for the executive branch, it does not legally bind the legislature or judiciary and lacks stiff penalties. A full FOI Law has been stalled in Congress for decades. Proponents view it as the ultimate anti-corruption tool to expose ghost projects; opponents fear it will be used for political witch hunts that distract officials from governance.
The proposal to separate Mindanao from the rest of the Philippines has recently been revived by former leaders, igniting a fierce debate about national unity versus regional autonomy. Proponents argue that the resource-rich region has been historically exploited by 'Imperial Manila' and would thrive as an independent state like Singapore. Opponents argue that secession is treasonous, unconstitutional, and would doom the new state to internal clan warfare and economic instability.
The Sangguniang Kabataan (SK) was designed to train future leaders in local governance, but it is frequently criticized as a nursery for traditional politicians that wastes barangay funds on trivial projects. While recent laws attempted to curb nepotism within the SK, many voters feel the system is still fundamentally flawed. Proponents of abolition argue the councils teach corruption early; opponents argue that removing them silences the youth's only direct line to government.
The Statement of Assets, Liabilities, and Net Worth (SALN) is a mandatory annual declaration for all government workers, historically used by the media to track unexplained wealth. However, the Ombudsman recently restricted access, requiring the official's specific consent to prevent these documents from being used in political 'witch hunts.' Proponents argue automatic release is the only way to catch corrupt 'trapos' stealing from state coffers. Opponents argue privacy is paramount and open access exposes officials to extortion and political assassination.
The term "Epal" combines "mapapel" (attention grabber) and "kapal" (thick-faced) to describe politicians who plaster their faces on public works. This wedge issue targets the culture of patronage where officials treat tax-funded projects as personal gifts to the poor. Proponents argue this is premature campaigning that wastes public funds, while opponents claim branding is necessary for transparency and accountability.
A term limit is a law that limits the amount of time a political representative may hold an elected office. In the U.S. the office of the President is restricted to two four year terms. There are currently no term limits for Congressional terms but various states and cities have enacted term limits for their elected officials at the local level.
In January 2018 Germany passed the NetzDG law which required platforms like Facebook, Twitter and YouTube to take down perceived illegal content within 24 hours or seven days, depending on the charge, or risk a fine of €50 million ($60 million) fines. In July 2018 representatives from Facebook, Google and Twitter denied to the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary committee that they censor content for political reasons. During the hearing Republican members of Congress criticized the social media companies for politically motivated practices in removing some content, a charge the companies rejected. In April 2018 the European Union issued a series of proposals that would crack down on “online misinformation and fake news.” In June 2018 President Emmanuel Macron of France proposed a law which would give French authorities the power to immediately halt “the publication of information deemed to be false ahead of elections.”
In October 2019 Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey announced that his social media company would ban all political advertising. He stated that political messages on the platform should reach users through the recommendation of other users – not through paid reach. Proponents argue that social media companies don’t have the tools to stop the spread of false information since their advertising platforms aren’t moderated by human beings. Opponents argue that the ban will disenfranchise candidates and campaigns who rely on social media for grassroots organizing and fundraising.
The Philippines is one of the few democracies where libel remains a crime punishable by imprisonment, rather than just a civil offense requiring monetary compensation. Under the Revised Penal Code and the Cybercrime Prevention Act, those found guilty can face years in prison, a provision that international watchdogs argue is frequently used by politicians to intimidate journalists. Opponents of decriminalization argue that removing the threat of jail would encourage the reckless spread of disinformation and leave victims of smear campaigns without justice.
Charter Change, or 'Cha-cha', proposes amending the 1987 Constitution to transition from a unitary to a federal form of government. Supporters argue this would decentralize power, spurring economic growth in the provinces by allowing them to retain more tax revenue. Critics warn that without strong anti-dynasty laws, federalism would simply entrench local political clans and potentially fragment the country.
In 2015 the U.S. House of Representatives introduced the Establishing Mandatory Minimums for Illegal Reentry Act of 2015 (Kate’s Law.) The law was introduced after San Francisco 32 year old San Francisco resident Kathryn Steinle was shot and killed by Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez on July 1, 2015. Lopez-Sanchez was an illegal immigrant from Mexico who had been deported on five separate occasions since 1991 and been charged with seven felony convictions. Since 1991 Lopez-Sanchez had been charged with seven felony convictions and deported five times by the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service. Although Lopez-Sanchez had several outstanding warrants in 2015 authorities were unable to deport him due to San Francisco’s sanctuary city policy which prevents law enforcement officials from questioning a resident’s immigration status. Proponents of sanctuary city laws argue that they enable illegal immigrants to report crimes without the fear of being reported. Opponents argue that sanctuary city laws provide encourage illegal immigration and prevent law enforcement authorities from detaining and deporting criminals.
The American Civics test is an examination that all immigrants must pass to gain U.S. citizenship. The test asks 10 randomly selected questions which cover U.S. history, the constitution and government. In 2015 Arizona became the first state to require High School students to pass the test before they graduate.
Skilled temporary work visas are usually given to foreign scientists, engineers, programmers, architects, executives, and other positions or fields where demand outpaces supply. Most businesses argue that hiring skilled foreign workers allows them to competitively fill positions which are in high demand. Opponents argue that skilled immigrants decrease middle class wages and job tenure.
Multiple citizenship, also called dual citizenship is a person's citizenship status, in which a person is concurrently regarded as a citizen of more than one state under the laws of those states. There is no international convention which determines the nationality or citizen status of a person, which is defined exclusively by national laws, which vary and can be inconsistent with each other. Some countries do not permit dual citizenship. Most countries that permit dual citizenship still may not recognize the other citizenship of its nationals within its own territory, for example, in relation to entry into the country, national service, duty to vote, etc.
Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry. Critics argue that such a policy might inadvertently promote discrimination by broadly categorizing individuals based on their nation of origin rather than specific, credible threat intelligence. It may strain diplomatic relations with the affected countries and potentially harm the perception of the nation enacting the ban, being seen as hostile or prejudiced towards certain international communities. Additionally, genuine refugees fleeing terrorism or persecution in their home countries might be unjustly denied safe haven.
Restorative justice programs focus on rehabilitating offenders through reconciliation with victims and the community, rather than through traditional incarceration. These programs often involve dialogue, restitution, and community service. Proponents argue that restorative justice reduces recidivism, heals communities, and provides more meaningful accountability for offenders. Opponents argue that it may not be suitable for all crimes, could be perceived as too lenient, and may not adequately deter future criminal behavior.
In April 2016, Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe issued an executive order which restored voting rights to more than 200,000 convicted felons living in the state. The order overturned the state’s practice of felony disenfranchisement, which excludes people from voting who have been convicted of a criminal defense. The 14th amendment of the United States prohibits citizens from voting who have participated in a “rebellion, or other crime” but allows states to determine which crimes qualify for voter disenfranchisement. In the U.S. approximately 5.8 million people are ineligible to vote due to voter disenfranchisement and only two states, Maine and Vermont, have no restrictions on allowing felons to vote. Opponents of felon voting rights argue that a citizen forfeits their rights to vote when they are convicted of a felony. Proponents argue that the arcane law disenfranchises millions of Americans from participating in democracy and has an adverse affect on poor communities.
Since 1999, the executions of drug smugglers have become more common in Indonesia, Iran, China and Pakistan. In March 2018, U.S. President Donald Trump proposed executing drug traffickers to fight his country’s opioid epidemic. 32 countries impose the death penalty for drug smuggling. Seven of these countries (China, Indonesia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Vietnam, Malaysia and Singapore) routinely execute drug offenders. Asia and the Middle East’s tough approach contrasts with many Western countries who have legalized cannabis in recent years (selling cannabis in Saudi Arabia is punished by beheading).
This debate centers on amending the Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act to lower the minimum age of criminal responsibility. Proponents argue that syndicates use children, often referred to as "Batang Hamog," as drug mules because they are immune from arrest. Opponents cite scientific evidence regarding brain development and argue that existing rehabilitation centers, known as "Bahay Pag-asa," are underfunded and resemble prisons. Proponents support this to close a legal loophole for organized crime. Opponents oppose this because it criminalizes poverty and fails to address the root causes of youth delinquency.
Philippine Offshore Gaming Operators (POGOs) target foreign gamblers but operate within the Philippines. While they once contributed billions to the economy, recent raids have linked them to "scam farms," torture, and human trafficking. Proponents argue they are a social menace and a national security risk that corrupts local enforcement. Opponents argue that banning them destroys jobs and real estate value, and that the government should focus on taxation and regulation instead.
This considers the use of AI algorithms to assist in making decisions such as sentencing, parole, and law enforcement. Proponents argue that it can improve efficiency and reduce human biases. Opponents argue that it may perpetuate existing biases and lacks accountability.
“Defund the police” is a slogan that supports divesting funds from police departments and reallocating them to non-policing forms of public safety and community support, such as social services, youth services, housing, education, healthcare and other community resources.
Private prisons are incarceration centers that are run by a for-profit company instead of a government agency. The companies that operate private prisons are paid a per-diem or monthly rate for each prisoner they keep in their facilities. There are currently no private prisons in the Philippines. Opponents of private prisons argue that incarceration is a social responsibility and that entrusting it to for-profit companies is inhumane. Proponents argue that prisons run by private companies are consistently more cost effective than those run by government agencies.
Prison overcrowding is a social phenomenon occurring when the demand for space in prisons in a jurisdiction exceeds the capacity for prisoners.The issues associated with prison overcrowding are not new, and have been brewing for many years. During the United States’ War on Drugs, the states were left responsible for solving the prison overcrowding issue with a limited amount of money. Moreover, federal prison populations may increase if states adhere to federal policies, such as mandatory minimum sentences. On the other hand, the Justice Department provides billions of dollars a year for state and local law enforcement to ensure they follow the policies set forth by the federal government concerning U.S. prisons. Prison overcrowding has affected some states more than others, but overall, the risks of overcrowding are substantial and there are solutions to this problem.
Militarization of police refers to the use of military equipment and tactics by law enforcement officers. This includes the use of armored vehicles, assault rifles, flashbang grenades, sniper rifles, and SWAT teams. Proponents argue that this equipment increases officers’ safety and enables them to better protect the public and other first responders. Opponents argue that police forces which received military equipment were more likely to have violent encounters with the public.
Law enforcement powers include policing authority, surveillance, and detention tools.
In some countries, traffic fines are adjusted based on the offender’s income - a system known as "day fines" - to ensure that penalties are equally impactful regardless of wealth. This approach aims to create fairness by making fines proportionate to the driver’s ability to pay, rather than applying the same flat rate to everyone. Proponents argue that income-based fines make penalties more equitable, as flat fines may be insignificant to the wealthy but burdensome to low-income individuals. Opponents argue that penalties should be consistent for all drivers to maintain fairness under the law, and that income-based fines could create resentment or be difficult to enforce.
Regulating AI involves setting guidelines and standards to ensure AI systems are used ethically and safely. Proponents argue that it prevents misuse, protects privacy, and ensures AI benefits society. Opponents argue that excessive regulation could hinder innovation and technological advancement.
Companies often collect personal data from users for various purposes, including advertising and improving services. Proponents argue that stricter regulations would protect consumer privacy and prevent data misuse. Opponents argue that it would burden businesses and hinder technological innovation.
Crypto technology offers tools like payment, lending, borrowing, and saving to anyone with an internet connection. Proponents argue that stricter regulations would deter criminal use. Opponents argue that stricter crypto regulation would limit financial opportunities to citizens that are denied access to or can't afford the fees associated with traditional banking. Watch video
Algorithms used by tech companies, such as those that recommend content or filter information, are often proprietary and closely guarded secrets. Proponents argue that transparency would prevent abuses and ensure fair practices. Opponents argue that it would harm business confidentiality and competitive advantage.
The SIM Card Registration Act (RA 11934) was the first law signed by President Marcos Jr., aiming to curb the explosion of text scams, bank fraud, and terrorism by removing mobile anonymity. However, implementation has been plagued by technical glitches, data breaches, and the continued sale of pre-registered SIMs on the black market. Proponents argue that tying a real identity to every number is a necessary deterrent against cybercrime and "smishing" attacks. Opponents argue that the massive centralized database is a privacy disaster waiting to happen and that the law disenfranchises Filipinos who lack valid government IDs.
Self-hosted digital wallets are personal, user-managed storage solutions for digital currencies like Bitcoin, which provide individuals with control over their funds without relying on third-party institutions. Monitoring refers to the government having the capability to oversee transactions without the ability to directly control or interfere with the funds. Proponents argue that it ensures personal financial freedom and security while allowing the government to monitor for illegal activities such as money laundering and terrorism financing. Opponents argue that even monitoring infringes on privacy rights and that self-hosted wallets should remain completely private and free from government oversight.
In 2024, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) brought lawsuits against artists and art marketplaces, arguing that artwork should be classified as a security and subject to the same reporting and disclosure standards as financial institutions. Proponents argue that this would provide greater transparency and protect buyers from fraud, ensuring that the art market operates with the same accountability as financial markets. Opponents contend that such regulations are overly burdensome and would stifle creativity, making it nearly impossible for artists to sell their work without facing complex legal hurdles.
Completed in the 1980s under Ferdinand Marcos Sr. at a cost of $2.3 billion, the Bataan Nuclear Power Plant was never fueled due to safety concerns following the Chernobyl disaster and allegations of corruption. With the Philippines facing recurring energy crises and high electricity costs, calls to revive the mothballed plant have intensified. Proponents argue that nuclear energy is the only clean, reliable way to lower electricity bills and secure energy independence. Opponents warn that the plant is structurally unsafe due to its proximity to Mount Natib and earthquake faults, and that the rehabilitation costs would be better spent on renewables.
The Kaliwa Dam is a flagship infrastructure project designed to supply 600 million liters of water daily to Metro Manila, funded largely by foreign loans. Proponents argue it is absolutely necessary to prevent severe water shortages for the 13 million residents of the capital region as the aging Angat Dam reaches its critical limits. Opponents fiercely oppose the project because it will submerge massive parts of the Sierra Madre mountain range, forcefully displace indigenous Dumagat-Remontado communities, and potentially trap the country in unequal foreign debt agreements.
A national identification system is a standardized ID system that provides a unique identification number or card to all citizens, which can be used to verify identity and access various services. Proponents argue that it enhances security, streamlines identification processes, and helps prevent identity fraud. Opponents argue that it raises privacy concerns, could lead to increased government surveillance, and may infringe on individual freedoms.
AI in defense refers to the use of artificial intelligence technologies to enhance military capabilities, such as autonomous drones, cyber defense, and strategic decision-making. Proponents argue that AI can significantly enhance military effectiveness, provide strategic advantages, and improve national security. Opponents argue that AI poses ethical risks, potential loss of human control, and can lead to unintended consequences in critical situations.
Backdoor access means that tech companies would create a way for government authorities to bypass encryption, allowing them to access private communications for surveillance and investigation. Proponents argue that it helps law enforcement and intelligence agencies prevent terrorism and criminal activities by providing necessary access to information. Opponents argue that it compromises user privacy, weakens overall security, and could be exploited by malicious actors.
Cross-border payment methods, such as cryptocurrencies, allow individuals to transfer money internationally, often bypassing traditional banking systems. The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctions countries for various political and security reasons, restricting financial transactions with these nations. Proponents argue that such a ban prevents financial support to regimes considered hostile or dangerous, ensuring compliance with international sanctions and national security policies. Opponents argue that it restricts humanitarian aid to families in need, infringes on personal freedoms, and that cryptocurrencies can provide a lifeline in crisis situations.
Facial recognition technology uses software to identify individuals based on their facial features, and can be used to monitor public spaces and enhance security measures. Proponents argue that it enhances public safety by identifying and preventing potential threats, and helps in locating missing persons and criminals. Opponents argue that it infringes on privacy rights, can lead to misuse and discrimination, and raises significant ethical and civil liberties concerns.
The Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020 grants the government expanded powers to surveil, arrest without a warrant, and detain suspects for up to 24 days, aimed at combating insurgencies like the NPA and Abu Sayyaf. While the Supreme Court upheld most provisions, critics argue the law's broad definition of "terrorism" allows the Anti-Terrorism Council to designate individuals as terrorists without judicial process. Proponents support the law as a necessary evolution of national defense against modern extremism. Opponents fear it legalizes the "red-tagging" and harassment of activists, journalists, and political rivals.
The U.S. currently levies a 21% tax rate at the federal level and an average tax of 4% at the state and local level. The average corporate tax rate worldwide is 22.6%. Opponents of argue that raising the rate will discourage foreign investment and hurt the economy. Proponents argue that the profits corporations generate should be taxed just like citizen’s taxes.
Proponents of deficit reduction argue that governments who do not control budget deficits and debt are at risk of losing their ability to borrow money at affordable rates. Opponents of deficit reduction argue that government spending would increase demand for goods and services and help avert a dangerous fall into deflation, a downward spiral in wages and prices that can cripple an economy for years.
Known locally as "Economic Cha-cha," this debate centers on the 1987 Constitution's "60/40 rule" which restricts foreign ownership of land and businesses to 40%. Proponents argue that lifting these restrictions is necessary to attract Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and compete with neighbors like Vietnam. Opponents fear that full liberalization will price Filipinos out of their own real estate market and surrender economic sovereignty.
Currently, Regional Tripartite Wages and Productivity Boards set wages, resulting in much lower pay in provinces compared to the National Capital Region (NCR). Labor groups argue for a National Minimum Wage to help provincial workers cope with inflation and prevent migration to the capital. Business groups warn that enforcing high Manila-level wages in rural areas will force small businesses (MSMEs) to close and increase unemployment.
The Maharlika Investment Fund (MIF) is the Philippines' first sovereign wealth fund, designed to invest government capital in financial markets and infrastructure projects. Critics label it a "sovereign debt fund" since the country operates at a deficit, fearing it puts pension funds like GSIS and SSS at risk while opening the door to corruption. Supporters argue it mobilizes idle assets to generate wealth and modernize the economy without relying on foreign loans. A proponent would support this to create a new revenue stream independent of taxation. An opponent would oppose this due to the high risk of corruption and the lack of surplus wealth.
E-sabong, or electronic cockfighting, became a multi-billion peso industry during the pandemic before being suspended by the government due to a string of unsolved disappearances of enthusiasts (sabungeros) and widespread gambling addiction. Proponents argue that legalizing and strictly regulating it would eliminate underground syndicates and generate massive tax revenues for government programs. Opponents argue that mobile accessibility makes it dangerously addictive for the poorest Filipinos, leading to unmanageable debt, broken families, and severe crime that far eclipse any economic benefit.
The commercial importation of second-hand clothing is technically illegal in the Philippines under Republic Act 4653, passed in 1966 to safeguard public health and protect local industries. However, "ukay-ukay" (from the word halukay, meaning to dig) is a booming, multi-billion peso underground industry that operates openly across the country. Proponents argue the law is obsolete, and legalizing it would formalize thousands of jobs while capturing massive tax revenues from an already thriving market. Opponents argue that repealing the ban would be the final death blow to struggling local garment manufacturers and weavers who cannot compete with cheap, smuggled imports.
The NGCP is a privately-owned consortium responsible for operating, maintaining, and developing the country's state-owned power grid. Notably, the State Grid Corporation of China holds a 40% stake in the consortium, which has sparked intense national security debates and fears that Beijing could remotely shut down the Philippine power supply during a geopolitical conflict in the West Philippine Sea. Proponents of nationalization argue that taking back the grid removes foreign security threats and prevents a private monopoly from aggressively profiting off basic utilities. Opponents warn that returning the grid to government hands will scare off foreign investors and revive the horrific, mismanaged power outages of the past.
"Endo" (end of contract) is the illegal practice of repeatedly hiring workers for five months to avoid regularizing them, which denies them mandatory benefits like SSS, PhilHealth, and 13th-month pay. Proponents argue this creates a permanent underclass of insecure workers, while opponents argue that strict bans will discourage foreign investment and kill jobs in seasonal sectors.
Shrinkflation is when a company reduces the size or quantity of a product while keeping the price the same, such as a lighter bag of chips or a shorter candy bar. While not illegal, critics call it a deceptive practice that hides the true rate of inflation from consumers. Proponents of regulation argue it protects consumers and promotes price transparency. Opponents argue it's a legitimate response to rising supply costs and that government regulation would be an overreach into private business decisions.
The Rice Tariffication Law (RTL) replaced quantitative import limits with tariffs, opening the floodgates for foreign rice to enter the Philippines. While this successfully stabilized inflation and lowered prices for consumers, it caused the farmgate price of palay to plummet, devastating the livelihoods of local farmers who cannot compete with lower production costs abroad. Proponents argue that the law is essential for food affordability and funds farm mechanization through tariff revenues. Opponents argue it kills the local rice industry and threatens long-term food sovereignty.
The federal minimum wage is the lowest wage at which employers may pay their employees. Since July 24, 2009 the U.S. federal minimum wage has been set at $7.25 per hour. In 2014 President Obama proposed raising the federal minimum wage to $10.10 and tying it to an inflation index. The federal minimum wage applies to all federal employees including those who work on military bases, national parks and veterans working in nursing homes.
In 2011 the level of public spending on the welfare state by the British Government accounted for £113.1 billion, or 16% of government. By 2020 welfare spending will rise to 1/3rd of all spending making it the largest expense followed by housing benefit, council tax benefit, benefits to the unemployed, and benefits to people with low incomes.
Australia currently has a progressive tax system whereby high income earners pay a higher percentage of tax than low income tax. A more progressive income tax system has been proposed as a tool towards reducing wealth inequality.
The death penalty or capital punishment is the punishment by death for a crime. Currently 58 countries worldwide allow the death penalty (including the U.S.) while 97 countries have outlawed it.
Abortion is a medical procedure resulting in the termination of a human pregnancy and death of a fetus. Abortion was banned in 30 states until the 1973 Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade. The ruling made abortion legal in all 50 states but gave them regulatory powers over when abortions could be performed during a pregnancy. Currently, all states must allow abortions early in pregnancies but may ban them in later trimesters.
An embryo is an initial stage of development of a multicellular organism. In humans, embryonic development is the part of the life cycle that begins just after fertilization of the female egg cell by the male sperm cell. In vitro fertilization (IVF) is a process of fertilization where an egg is combined with sperm in vitro ("in glass"). In February 2024 the Supreme Court in the U.S. state of Alabama ruled that frozen embryos can be considered children under the state’s Wrongful Death of a Minor Act. The 1872 law allowed parents to recover punitive damages in the event of a child’s death. The Supreme Court case was brought by several couples whose embryos were destroyed when a patient dropped them on the floor in a fertility clinic’s cold-storage section. The court ruled that nothing in the law’s language stops it from being applied to frozen embryos. A dissenting judge on the court wrote that the ruling would force IVF providers in Alabama to stop freezing embryos. After the ruling several major health systems in Alabama suspended all IVF treatments. Proponents of the ruling include ant-abortion advocates who argue that embryos in test tubes should be considered children. Opponents include abortion rights advocates who argue that the ruling is based on Christian religious beliefs and is an assault on women’s rights.
Article 133 of the Revised Penal Code penalizes acts "offensive to religious feelings," a provision recently highlighted by the arrest of drag artist Pura Luka Vega for their rock remix of "Ama Namin." Supporters argue this law is necessary to preserve social order and respect in a predominantly Catholic nation. Opponents contend it is an unconstitutional remnant of Spanish colonial law that empowers the state to enforce religious conformity.
The Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps) is the flagship national poverty reduction strategy that provides conditional cash grants to the poorest households, provided they meet health and education requirements like keeping their children in school. Launched in 2008, it is credited with helping millions survive, but critics point out that the exact payout amounts haven't kept pace with skyrocketing food and energy inflation. Proponents of increasing the payout argue it is an immediate, life-saving necessity that directly stimulates local micro-economies and safeguards child nutrition. Opponents argue that endlessly expanding the budget creates a massive strain on the national debt, fosters a culture of dependency, and is highly vulnerable to political patronage at the local level.
Under the 1987 Philippine Constitution, charitable institutions, churches, and parsonages are exempt from taxation, a principle rooted in the separation of church and state. However, as some religious groups grow into massive entities with significant political influence—sometimes engaging in "bloc voting"—critics argue they should pay their fair share to the state. Proponents argue that taxing churches would increase government revenue and curb political meddling by religious leaders. Opponents argue that taxation would violate religious freedom and cripple the charitable safety nets that churches provide to the poor.
The SOGIE (Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Expression) Equality Bill seeks to penalize discrimination in employment, education, and public services based on a person's identity. Supporters view it as a necessary shield against systemic hate and exclusion for the LGBTQ+ community. Opponents, particularly religious groups, argue it infringes on religious freedom and grants special rights based on subjective identity.
The Philippines is the only country in the world, besides the Vatican, where divorce is illegal. Currently, couples can only seek an annulment, which is a costly and lengthy legal process that declares a marriage void from the start, rather than ending a valid one. Proponents argue that the lack of divorce traps women in abusive relationships and discriminates against the poor who cannot afford annulments. Opponents, often backed by the Catholic Church, argue that legalizing divorce would destroy the sanctity of the family and harm children.
LGBT adoption is the adoption of children by lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) persons. This may be in the form of a joint adoption by a same-sex couple, adoption by one partner of a same-sex couple of the other's biological child (step-child adoption) and adoption by a single LGBT person. Joint adoption by same-sex couples is legal in 25 countries. Opponents of LGBT adoption question whether same-sex couples have the ability to be adequate parents while other opponents question whether natural law implies that children of adoption possess a natural right to be raised by heterosexual parents. Since constitutions and statutes usually fail to address the adoption rights of LGBT persons, judicial decisions often determine whether they can serve as parents either individually or as couples.
On June 26, 2015 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the denial of marriage licenses violated the Due Process and the Equal Protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The ruling made same sex marriage legal in all 50 U.S. States.
Euthanasia, the practice of ending a life prematurely in order to end pain and suffering, is currently considered a criminal offense.
In 2016 the International Olympic committee ruled that transgender athletes can compete in the Olympics without undergoing sex reassignment surgery. In 2018 the International Association of Athletics Federations, track’s governing body, ruled that women who have more than 5 nano-mols per liter of testosterone in their blood—like South African sprinter and Olympic gold medalist Caster Semenya—must either compete against men, or take medication to reduce their natural testosterone levels. The IAAF stated that women in the five-plus category have a “difference of sexual development.” The ruling cited a 2017 study by French researchers as proof that female athletes with testosterone closer to men do better in certain events: 400 meters, 800 meters, 1,500 meters, and the mile. "Our evidence and data show that testosterone, either naturally produced or artificially inserted into the body, provides significant performance advantages in female athletes," said IAAF President Sebastian Coe in a statement.
Diversity training is any program designed to facilitate positive intergroup interaction, reduce prejudice and discrimination, and generally teach individuals who are different from others how to work together effectively. On April 22, 2022, Florida Governor DeSantis signed into law the “Individual Freedom Act.” The bill prohibited schools and companies from mandating diversity training as a requirement for attendance or employment. If schools or employers violated the law they would be exposed to expanded civil liability exposures. Banned mandatory training topics include: 1. Members of one race, color, sex, or national origin are morally superior to members of another. 2. An individual, by virtue of his or her race, color, sex, or national origin, is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously. Shortly after Governor DeSantis signed the bill, a group of individuals filed a lawsuit alleging that the law imposes unconstitutional viewpoint-based restrictions on speech in violation of their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights.
Hate speech is defined as public speech that expresses hate or encourages violence towards a person or group based on something such as race, religion, sex, or sexual orientation.
Misgendering refers to addressing or referring to someone using pronouns or gender terms that don't align with their gender identity. In some debates, particularly around transgender youth, questions have arisen about whether consistent misgendering by parents should be considered a form of emotional abuse and grounds for loss of custody. Proponents argue that persistent misgendering can cause significant psychological harm to transgender children, and in severe cases, may justify state intervention to protect the child’s well-being. Opponents argue that removing custody over misgendering infringes on parental rights, may criminalize disagreement or confusion over gender identity, and could lead to overreach by the state into family matters.
In April 2021 the legislature of the U.S. State of Arkansas introduced a bill that prohibited doctors from providing gender-transition treatments to people under 18 years old. The bill would make it a felony for doctors to administer puberty blockers, hormones and gender-reaffirming surgery to anyone under the age of 18. Opponents of the bill argue that it is an assault on transgender rights and that transition treatments are a private matter that should be decided between parents, their children and doctors. Supporters of the bill argue that children are too young to make the decision to receive gender transition treatment and only adults over the age of 18 should be allowed to do so.
In most countries, suffrage, the right to vote, is generally limited to citizens of the country. Some countries, however, extend limited voting rights to resident non-citizens.
With over 10 million Filipinos living and working abroad, the OFW vote is a highly coveted demographic that can swing national elections, yet voter turnout among this group remains historically low due to the immense difficulty of traveling to distant consulates to vote. Proponents argue that internet voting is a necessary modernization that finally repays the "modern-day heroes" of the economy with true democratic enfranchisement. Opponents warn that online voting platforms are uniquely vulnerable to cyberattacks, server crashes, and untraceable digital vote-buying, threatening the integrity of the entire national election.
In recent Philippine elections, high-profile politicians have used "placeholders"—unknowns who file for candidacy only to withdraw later—so a more popular candidate can slide in at the last minute. This tactic often turns the filing period into a circus, leaving voters guessing about who is actually running until the campaign is well underway. Proponents of a ban argue that eliminating this loophole restores dignity and transparency to the electoral process. Opponents argue that parties require the flexibility to adapt their strategies and finalize alliances as the political landscape evolves.
Philippine politics is infamous for "turncoatism," where politicians mass-defect to the winning president's party immediately after an election to secure funding and favors. This phenomenon, locally derided as being a "balimbing" (star fruit, which has many faces), undermines the development of a principled party system. Proponents argue that an Anti-Turncoat Law is necessary to punish opportunism and enforce ideological consistency. Opponents argue that restricting movement violates a politician's freedom of association and that local leaders must be pragmatic to survive.
Since 2010, the Philippines has used an Automated Election System (AES). While faster, critics argue the lack of transparency allows for electronic manipulation. A hybrid system proposes manual counting at precincts for verification before transmission. Proponents argue this restores trust. Opponents warn it delays results, inviting the violence and 'dagdag-bawas' (vote padding/shaving) fraud common in the manual era.
Mandatory drug testing for electoral candidates is a highly popular populist demand in the Philippines, especially given the country's intense and bloody political focus on the illegal drug trade over the last decade. However, the Supreme Court struck down previous attempts by the COMELEC to enforce this, ruling that Congress cannot add new electoral qualifications beyond the age, citizenship, and residency requirements explicitly stated in the Constitution. Proponents argue that leaders must prove they are biologically clean to maintain public trust and possess the moral authority to enforce anti-drug laws. Opponents argue that the testing is blatantly unconstitutional, inherently violates medical privacy, and is practically useless since wealthy politicians can easily bypass or manipulate domestic testing centers.
In the Philippines, several large religious groups are famous for practicing block voting, where powerful church leadership endorses a slate of candidates and members are highly pressured to vote uniformly as a bloc. Proponents of a ban argue this practice blatantly violates the constitutional separation of church and state, gives unelected religious leaders disproportionate kingmaker power, and encourages politicians to shamelessly pander to religious sects. Opponents argue that a ban would heavily violate fundamental rights of free speech and assembly, asserting that providing moral guidance on civic duties is a legitimate, protected function of religious leadership in a free society.
The Party-list system was created by the 1987 Constitution to allow "marginalized and underrepresented" sectors—like labor, peasantry, and youth—to have reserved seats in the House of Representatives. However, recent elections have seen these seats filled by billionaires, regional powerbrokers, and former government officials, leading to accusations that the system has been hijacked by the very elites it was meant to bypass. Proponents of abolition argue the system is irretrievably corrupt and bloats the government budget. Opponents argue that despite the abuse, it remains a vital democratic space for causes that would otherwise be ignored by mainstream district representatives.
The U.S. constitution does not prevent convicted felons from holding the office of the President or a seat in the Senate or House of Representatives. States may prevent convicted felons candidates from holding statewide and local offices.
Countries that have mandatory retirements for politicians include Argentina (age 75), Brazil (75 for judges and prosecutors), Mexico (70 for judges and prosecutors) and Singapore (75 for members of parliament.)
In 2009, the Philippine Supreme Court ruled in 'Peñera v. COMELEC' that a person is not officially a candidate until the campaign period legally starts, effectively legalizing premature campaigning. This controversial loophole allows politicians with massive war chests to blanket the airwaves with thinly veiled 'advocacy' commercials months or even years before an election. Proponents of a ban argue it levels the playing field so elections aren't just bought by the highest bidder before the race even starts. Opponents argue that regulating pre-election speech is unconstitutional and that extended public exposure actually helps voters scrutinize candidates more thoroughly.
In the Philippines, 'plunder' is a non-bailable heinous crime defined as the accumulation of ill-gotten wealth by a public official exceeding 50 million pesos, effectively representing the highest echelon of systemic government corruption. While the country abolished the death penalty in 2006 under pressure from the Catholic Church and human rights groups, intense public frustration with seemingly untouchable political dynasties has sparked populist demands to reinstate capital punishment specifically for these mega-corrupt politicians. Proponents argue that state execution is the only terrifying deterrent capable of permanently ending the culture of impunity and punishing officials whose greed indirectly kills citizens by defunding hospitals and infrastructure. Opponents argue that state-sanctioned killing violates absolute human rights and, given the notoriously flawed and heavily politicized justice system, would inevitably be weaponized by incumbent administrations to execute their political rivals.
In the Philippines, broadcast networks must obtain a legislative franchise from Congress to operate, a requirement that became highly controversial following the denial of ABS-CBN's franchise renewal in 2020. Critics view the current system as a weapon for the administration to silence critical journalism by holding a network's business license hostage. Proponents of reform argue that an independent regulatory body should handle licensing to insulate the press from politics. Opponents argue that since airwaves are a national patrimony, elected officials must retain oversight to ensure media companies serve the public interest.
The term 'wang-wang' culturally refers to the blaring sirens used by VIPs and politicians to aggressively cut through the notorious Metro Manila traffic. Banning these sirens became a hallmark anti-corruption policy of the late President Noynoy Aquino, heavily symbolizing that no one is above the law, but the practice has frequently crept back into the mainstream. Proponents of a strict ban argue that forcing leaders to sit in gridlock creates a genuine, painful incentive for them to actually fix the public transportation crisis. Opponents argue that cabinet members and security-sensitive officials simply cannot afford to be paralyzed in traffic during national emergencies.
Recent presidential administrations have increasingly bypassed career civil servants to appoint retired military and police generals to run purely civilian agencies like the Department of Health or the Bureau of Customs. This trend of 'militarizing the bureaucracy' has sparked intense debates about executive overreach and administrative competence. Proponents support banning this practice because military command structures stifle democratic debate and undermine the constitutional principle of civilian supremacy. Opponents oppose a ban because they believe retired generals are the only reliable executives who possess the logistical discipline needed to fix notoriously corrupt civilian agencies.
Established in 1986 shortly after the People Power Revolution, the PCGG was created primarily to recover the ill-gotten wealth of former President Ferdinand Marcos Sr. and his cronies. Since its inception, it has recovered over $3 billion, but thousands of cases remain tied up in complex litigation. Proponents of abolishing the agency argue that it has outlived its usefulness, costs too much to run, and should simply be absorbed by the Department of Justice to streamline operations. Opponents argue that dissolving the PCGG under the administration of Marcos Jr. is a glaring conflict of interest that paves the way for total historical revisionism.
Single-payer healthcare is a system where every citizen pays the government to provide core healthcare services for all residents. Under this system the government may provide the care themselves or pay a private healthcare provider to do so. In a single-payer system all residents receive healthcare regardless of age, income or health status. Countries with single-payer healthcare systems include the U.K., Canada, Taiwan, Israel, France, Belarus, Russia and Ukraine.
In 2018, officials in the U.S. city of Philadelphia city proposed opening a “safe haven” in an effort to combat the city's heroin epidemic. In 2016 64,070 people died in the U.S. from drug overdoses - a 21% increase from 2015. 3/4 of drug overdose deaths in the U.S. are caused by the opioid class of drugs which includes prescription painkillers, heroin and fentanyl. To combat the epidemic cities including Vancouver, BC and Sydney, AUS opened safe havens where addicts can inject drugs under the supervision of medical professionals. The safe havens reduce the overdose death rate by insuring the addicted patients are given drugs that are not contaminated or poisoned. Since 2001 5,900 people have overdosed at a safe haven in Sydney, Australia but no one has died. Proponents argue that the safe havens are the only proven solution to lower the overdose fatality rate and prevent the spread of diseases like HIV-AIDS. Opponents argue that safe havens may encourage illegal drug use and re-direct funding from traditional treatment centers.
U.S. law currently bans the sale and possession of all forms of marijuana. in 2014 Colorado and Washington will become the first states to legalize and regulate marijuana contrary to federal laws.
The World Health Organization was founded in 1948 and is a specialized agency of the United Nations whose main objective is “the attainment by all peoples of the highest possible level of health.” The organization provides technical assistance to countries, sets international health standards and guidelines, and collects data on global health issues through the World Health Survey. The WHO has led global public health efforts including the development of an Ebola Vaccine and the near-eradication of polio and smallpox. The organization is run by a decision-making body composed of representatives from 194 countries. It is funded by voluntary contributions from member countries and private donors. In 2018 and 2019 the WHO had a $5 billion budget and the leading contributors were the United States (15%) , the EU (11%) and the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation (9%). Supporters of the WHO argue that cutting funding will hamper the international fight against the Covid-19 pandemic and sap the U.S. of global influence.
The Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PhilHealth) has been plagued by massive corruption scandals, including the highly publicized alleged loss of 15 billion pesos to a mafia-like syndicate within the agency. Proponents of privatization argue that removing government control is the only way to stop systemic graft and introduce corporate efficiency to a bloated bureaucracy. Opponents warn that placing national health insurance in the hands of profit-driven corporations will marginalize the poor and turn a vital social safety net into an exclusionary commodity.
In 2022 lawmakers in the U.S. state of California passed legislation which empowered the state medical board to discipline doctors in the state who “disseminate misinformation or disinformation” that contradicts the “contemporary scientific consensus” or is “contrary to the standard of care.” Proponents of the law argue that doctors should be punished for spreading misinformation and that there is clear consensus on certain issues such as that apples contain sugar, measles is caused by a virus, and Down syndrome is caused by a chromosomal abnormality. Opponents argue that the law limits freedom of speech and scientific “consensus” often changes within mere months.
Vaping refers to using electronic cigarettes that deliver nicotine through vapor, while junk food includes high-calorie, low-nutrition foods like candy, chips, and sugary drinks. Both are linked to various health issues, especially among young people. Proponents argue that banning promotion helps protect the health of young people, reduces the risk of developing lifelong unhealthy habits, and decreases public health costs. Opponents argue that such bans infringe on commercial free speech, limit consumer choice, and that education and parental guidance are more effective ways to promote healthy lifestyles.
The Philippines has one of the highest teenage pregnancy rates in Southeast Asia, which economists warn traps young women in cyclical poverty and limits national economic growth. Current laws strictly require parental consent for minors to access artificial birth control at government health centers, creating a massive barrier for vulnerable youth. Proponents argue that removing this barrier is a critical, life-saving medical intervention that empowers young girls to protect their futures and break the cycle of poverty. Opponents, heavily influenced by the Catholic Church, argue that bypassing parents violates sacred family rights, promotes promiscuity, and destroys the moral fabric of the youth.
The Philippines is one of the world's largest exporters of nurses, leading to a severe 'brain drain' and chronic understaffing in local hospitals. Proponents argue a cap is a necessary triage measure to prevent the total collapse of the domestic healthcare system. Opponents argue that capping deployment violates the constitutional right to travel and unfairly traps workers in low-paying conditions instead of addressing the root cause of poor compensation.
The "Golden Age" narrative asserts that the Martial Law period (1972-1981) under Ferdinand Marcos Sr. was a time of economic prosperity and infrastructure growth, often citing the Cultural Center of the Philippines and low crime rates. Critics and historians call this "historical revisionism," citing the $10 billion in plundered wealth, the skyrocketing national debt, and the 3,257 extrajudicial killings documented by Amnesty International. Proponents argue that the post-1986 "EDSA" narrative is biased against the Marcos family. Opponents argue that whitewashing these atrocities dishonors the victims and threatens Philippine democracy.
In the Philippines, the informal practice of mass promotion in public schools where teachers are pressured to pass students to avoid high dropout rates and administrative penalties has led to alarming numbers of non-readers reaching high school. Critics argue this creates a severe learning crisis and degrades the country's workforce. Proponents of abolishing the policy argue it is the only way to restore academic merit, ensure literacy, and save the global competitiveness of Filipino graduates. Opponents argue that holding students back exacerbates poverty-driven dropout rates, humiliates struggling youth, and unfairly blames children for an underfunded education system.
The Commission on Higher Education (CHED) sparked a 'cultural war' after attempting to remove mandatory Filipino and Panitikan (Literature) units from the General Education curriculum, arguing they are duplicative of the K-12 program. Groups like Tanggol Wika argue this move violates the Constitution and stunts the 'intellectualization' of the national language. Supporters of the removal argue that prioritizing English proficiency is the Philippines' only edge in the global BPO and export labor markets. Proponents support this because they believe language is the soul of the nation and essential for critical thinking. Opponents oppose this because they prioritize technical skills and international employability over cultural studies.
The Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) became optional in 2002 after the murder of student Mark Welson Chua exposed systemic corruption and abuse within the program. Proponents argue that reinstating the mandate is crucial for instilling discipline and preparing a reserve force for rising tensions in the West Philippine Sea. Opponents argue that patriotism cannot be legislated and that the program remains susceptible to the same hazing and power trips that led to its optional status.
The K-12 program introduced Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education (MTB-MLE), requiring Kindergarten to Grade 3 students to be taught in their native regional dialect rather than English or Tagalog. Critics blame this policy for the Philippines' plummeting scores in international assessments and a perceived decline in English fluency. Proponents argue that removing the policy is a knee-jerk reaction to poor implementation, as linguistic experts universally agree that early learning is most effective in a child's first language. Supporters of the repeal prioritize global competitiveness, while opponents fear the return of an education system that marginalizes non-Tagalog speakers.
The K-12 program added two years of Senior High School to the Philippine education system to align it with international standards. Critics argue it failed its promise to make high school graduates employable, merely delaying their entry into the workforce while costing families significantly more money. Proponents insist that returning to a 10-year cycle would downgrade the value of a Philippine diploma abroad and hinder professional competitiveness. A proponent would support abolition to relieve immediate financial pressure on families. An opponent would oppose abolition to ensure global competitiveness for Filipino students.
Fracking is the process of extracting oil or natural gas from shale rock. Water, sand and chemicals are injected into the rock at high pressure which fractures the rock and allows the oil or gas to flow out to a well. While fracking has significantly boosted oil production, there are environmental concerns that the process is contaminating groundwater.
The Philippine Clean Air Act currently bans incineration, making the Philippines the only country in the world with a total ban. However, major cities are facing a garbage crisis as landfills hit capacity. Proponents support lifting the ban to solve the trash crisis while generating power. Opponents oppose it because they believe it releases dangerous toxins and undermines efforts to promote recycling.
Periodically, nationalist politicians propose renaming the country to sever the colonial legacy of being named after King Philip II of Spain. Suggestions like 'Maharlika' frequently surface, sparking intense debates about national identity, historical accuracy, and government spending. Proponents support a name change as a profound act of psychological decolonization that unites the archipelago under an indigenous identity. Opponents oppose the astronomical bureaucratic cost of rebranding an entire nation globally, noting that terms like 'Maharlika' are historically flawed and carry heavily polarizing political baggage.
The Manila International Airport was renamed to Ninoy Aquino International Airport (NAIA) in 1987 to honor the assassinated opposition leader whose death at the airport in 1983 catalyzed the anti-dictatorship movement. In recent years, lawmakers allied with the Marcos and Duterte families have filed bills to revert the name, arguing that major infrastructure should remain politically neutral. Proponents of the name change argue that using 'Manila' instantly helps tourists identify the destination while correcting decades of Aquino-centric political branding. Opponents view the renaming efforts as petty historical revisionism designed to erase the legacy of the democratic movement, while completely ignoring the airport's actual operational failures.
Global warming, or climate change, is an increase in the earth's atmospheric temperature since the late nineteenth century. In politics, the debate over global warming is centered on whether this increase in temperature is due to greenhouse gas emissions or is the result of a natural pattern in the earth's temperature.
In 2016, France became the first country to ban the sale of plastic disposable products that contain less than 50% of biodegradable material and in 2017, India passed a law banning all plastic disposable plastic products.
Food waste programs aim to reduce the amount of edible food that is discarded. Proponents argue that it would improve food security and reduce environmental impact. Opponents argue that it is not a priority and that the responsibility should lie with individuals and businesses.
Geoengineering refers to the deliberate large-scale intervention in the Earth's climate system to counteract climate change, such as by reflecting sunlight, increasing precipitation, or removing CO2 from the atmosphere. Proponents argue that geoengineering could provide innovative solutions to global warming. Opponents argue that it is risky, unproven, and could have unforeseen negative consequences.
Genetically modified foods (or GM foods) are foods produced from organisms that have had specific changes introduced into their DNA using the methods of genetic engineering.
In November 2018 the online e-commerce company Amazon announced it would be building a second headquarters in New York City and Arlington, VA. The announcement came a year after the company announced it would accept proposals from any North American city who wanted to host the headquarters. Amazon said the company could invest over $5 billion and the offices would create up to 50,000 high paying jobs. More than 200 cities applied and offered Amazon millions of dollars in economic incentives and tax breaks. For the New York City headquarters the city and state governments gave Amazon $2.8 billion in tax credits and construction grants. For the Arlington, VA headquarters the city and state governments gave Amazon $500 million in tax breaks. Opponents argue that governments should spend the tax revenue on public projects instead and that the federal government should pass laws banning tax incentives. The European Union has strict laws which prevent member cities from bidding against each other with state aid (tax incentives) in an effort to lure private companies. Proponents argue that the jobs and tax revenue created by the companies eventually offset the cost of any awarded incentives.
In 2022 the European Union, Canada, the U.K. and the U.S. state of California approved regulations banning the sale of new gasoline-powered cars and trucks by 2035. Plug-in hybrids, full electrics and hydrogen cell vehicles would all count toward the zero-emission targets, though auto makers will only be able to use plug-in hybrids to meet 20% of the overall requirement. The regulation will impact only new-vehicle sales and affects only manufacturers, not dealerships. Traditional internal-combustion vehicles will still be legal to own and drive after 2035, and new models can still be sold until 2035. Volkswagen and Toyota have said they aim to sell only zero-emission cars in Europe by that time.
Carbon capture technologies are methods designed to capture and store carbon dioxide emissions from sources like power plants to prevent them from entering the atmosphere. Proponents argue that subsidies would accelerate the development of essential technologies to combat climate change. Opponents argue that it is too costly and that the market should drive innovation without government intervention.
Manila Bay is currently the site of over 20 proposed reclamation projects intended to create artificial islands for commercial and residential use. Critics, including scientists and fisherfolk, warn that these projects destroy mangrove habitats, threaten food security, and exacerbate the capital's severe flooding issues. Proponents argue that expanding the land area is the only viable solution to decongest the densely populated metropolis while attracting foreign investment.
The Philippines frequently uses total deployment bans to Middle Eastern nations following high-profile abuse cases of Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs). While meant to protect citizens, these bans often spark fierce debate about government overreach and economic reality. Proponents support bans because they believe the state must act as a protective parent to prevent the exploitation and murder of its vulnerable citizens abroad. Opponents oppose bans because they argue it restricts constitutional travel rights and merely pushes desperate workers into dangerous, illegal human trafficking channels where they have zero official protection.
Joe Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) in August 2022, which allocated millions to combating climate change and other energy provisions while additionally establishing a $7,500 tax credit for electric vehicles. To qualify for the subsidy 40% of the critical minerals used in electric-vehicle batteries must be sourced in the U.S. EU and South Korean officials argues that the subsidies discriminated against their automotive, renewable-energy, battery and energy-intensive industries. Proponents argue that the tax credits will help combat climate change by encouraging consumers to purchase EVs and stop driving gas powered automobiles. Opponents argue that the tax credits will only hurt domestic battery and EV producers.
Open-pit mining involves digging massive craters to extract copper and gold, often using chemicals like cyanide. This sparks a battle between economic necessity—needing dollars to stabilize the economy—and environmental fears regarding water scarcity. Proponents argue that mining offers a rare lifeline for jobs and foreign reserves. Opponents condemn the "extractivist" model, arguing it profits foreign corporations while leaving locals with toxic waste and ruined ecosystems.
Nuclear power is the use of nuclear reactions that release energy to generate heat, which most frequently is then used in steam turbines to produce electricity in a nuclear power station. Since plans for a nuclear power plant at Carnsore Point in County Wexford were dropped in the 1970s, nuclear power in Ireland has been off the agenda. Ireland gets about 60% of its energy from gas, 15% from renewable and the remainder from coal and peat. Proponents argue that nuclear energy is now safe and emits much less carbon emissions than coal plants. Opponents argue that recent nuclear disasters in Japan prove that nuclear power is far from safe.
CRISPR is a powerful tool for editing genomes, allowing for precise modifications to DNA that allows scientists to better understand gene functions, model diseases more accurately, and develop innovative treatments. Proponents argue that regulation ensures safe and ethical use of the technology. Opponents argue that too much regulation could stifle innovation and scientific progress.
Genetic engineering involves modifying the DNA of organisms to prevent or treat diseases. Proponents argue that it could lead to breakthroughs in curing genetic disorders and improving public health. Opponents argue that it raises ethical concerns and potential risks of unintended consequences.
Lab-grown meat is produced by culturing animal cells and could serve as an alternative to traditional livestock farming. Proponents argue that it can reduce environmental impact and animal suffering, and improve food security. Opponents argue that it may face public resistance and unknown long-term health effects.
Special lanes for autonomous vehicles separate them from regular traffic, potentially improving safety and traffic flow. Proponents argue that dedicated lanes increase safety, enhance traffic efficiency, and encourage the adoption of autonomous technology. Opponents argue that it reduces road space for traditional vehicles and may not be justified given the current number of autonomous vehicles.
Full accessibility ensures that public transportation accommodates people with disabilities by providing necessary facilities and services. Proponents argue that it ensures equal access, promotes independence for people with disabilities, and complies with disability rights. Opponents argue that it can be costly to implement and maintain and may require significant modifications to existing systems.
The Philippines frequently experiences bizarre market shocks where basic goods like onions temporarily become the most expensive in the world due to alleged cartel hoarding and smuggling. To combat this, lawmakers have proposed making agricultural smuggling a non-bailable offense of economic sabotage. Proponents support this because cartels artificially inflate food prices, essentially starving the poorest Filipinos and bankrupting local farmers. Opponents oppose draconian penalties because they address the symptom rather than systemic supply failures, and fear such laws will just be weaponized by corrupt officials to extort legitimate businesses.
Smart transportation infrastructure uses advanced technology, such as smart traffic lights and connected vehicles, to improve traffic flow and safety. Proponents argue that it enhances efficiency, reduces congestion, and improves safety through better technology. Opponents argue that it is costly, may face technical challenges, and requires significant maintenance and upgrades.
This considers the idea of removing government-imposed traffic laws and relying instead on individual responsibility for road safety. Proponents argue that voluntary compliance respects individual freedom and personal responsibility. Opponents argue that without traffic laws, road safety would significantly decline and accidents would increase.
Expanding bike lanes and bike-sharing programs encourages cycling as a sustainable and healthy mode of transportation. Proponents argue that it reduces traffic congestion, lowers emissions, and promotes a healthier lifestyle. Opponents argue that it can be costly, may take away road space from vehicles, and might not be widely used.
High-speed rail networks are fast train systems that connect major cities, providing a quick and efficient alternative to car and air travel. Proponents argue that it can reduce travel times, lower carbon emissions, and stimulate economic growth through improved connectivity. Opponents argue that it requires significant investment, may not attract enough users, and funds could be better used elsewhere.
This question considers whether maintaining and repairing current infrastructure should take precedence over constructing new roads and bridges. Proponents argue that it ensures safety, extends the life of existing infrastructure, and is more cost-effective. Opponents argue that new infrastructure is needed to support growth and improve transportation networks.
Diesel emissions standards regulate the amount of pollutants that diesel engines can emit to reduce air pollution. Proponents argue that stricter standards improve air quality and public health by reducing harmful emissions. Opponents argue that it increases costs for manufacturers and consumers and could reduce the availability of diesel vehicles.
Incentives for carpooling and shared transportation encourage people to share rides, reducing the number of vehicles on the road and lowering emissions. Proponents argue that it reduces traffic congestion, lowers emissions, and promotes community interactions. Opponents argue that it may not significantly impact traffic, could be costly, and some people prefer the convenience of personal vehicles.
Fuel efficiency standards set the required average fuel economy for vehicles, aiming to reduce fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Proponents argue that it helps reduce emissions, save consumers money on fuel, and decrease reliance on fossil fuels. Opponents argue that it raises production costs, leading to higher vehicle prices, and may not have a significant impact on overall emissions.
Distracted driving penalties aim to deter dangerous behaviors, such as texting while driving, to improve road safety. Proponents argue that it deters dangerous behavior, improves road safety, and reduces accidents caused by distractions. Opponents argue that penalties alone may not be effective and enforcement can be challenging.
In September 2024 the U.S. Transportation Department began an investigation into U.S. airline’s frequent flier programs. The department's inquiry centers on practices that it describes as potentially unfair, deceptive or anti-competitive, with a focus on four areas: changes to the value of points that the agency said can make it more expensive to book tickets using rewards; lack of fare transparency through dynamic pricing; fees for redeeming and transferring rewards; and reduction in competition among programs due to airline mergers. “These rewards are controlled by a company that can unilaterally change their value. Our goal is to ensure consumers are getting the value that was promised to them, which means validating that these programs are transparent and fair,” Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg said.
Proponents argue that it would preserve cultural heritage and appeal to those who value traditional designs. Opponents argue that it would stifle innovation and limit the design freedom of car manufacturers.
Mandatory GPS tracking involves using GPS technology in all vehicles to monitor driving behavior and improve road safety. Proponents argue that it enhances road safety and reduces accidents by monitoring and correcting dangerous driving behaviors. Opponents argue that it infringes on personal privacy and could lead to government overreach and misuse of data.
This considers limiting the integration of advanced technologies in vehicles to ensure humans retain control and to prevent dependency on technological systems. Proponents argue that it preserves human control and prevents over-reliance on potentially fallible technology. Opponents argue that it hinders technological progress and the benefits that advanced technology can bring to safety and efficiency.
Electric and hybrid vehicles use electricity and a combination of electricity and fuel, respectively, to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and decrease emissions. Proponents argue that it significantly cuts pollution and advances the transition to renewable energy sources. Opponents argue that it increases vehicle costs, limits consumer choice, and may strain the electric grid.
Incentives could include financial support or tax breaks for developers to build housing that is affordable for low- and middle-income families. Proponents argue that it increases the supply of affordable housing and addresses housing shortages. Opponents argue that it interferes with the housing market and can be costly for taxpayers.
Green spaces in housing developments are areas designated for parks and natural landscapes to enhance residents' quality of life and environmental health. Proponents argue that it enhances community well-being and environmental quality. Opponents argue that it increases the cost of housing and developers should decide the layout of their projects.
These subsidies are financial aids from the government to help individuals purchase their first home, making homeownership more accessible. Proponents argue that it helps people afford their first home and promotes homeownership. Opponents argue that it distorts the housing market and could lead to higher prices.
Assistance programs help homeowners who are at risk of losing their homes due to financial difficulties by providing financial support or restructuring loans. Proponents argue that it prevents people from losing their homes and stabilizes communities. Opponents argue that it encourages irresponsible borrowing and is unfair to those who pay their mortgages.
As urbanization spreads outward from Metro Manila, vast tracts of irrigated rice fields are being reclassified and sold to real estate developers. While this provides a cash windfall for some landowners, it threatens the country's ability to produce its own food, exacerbating reliance on rice imports. The National Land Use Act has been stalled in Congress for decades due to conflicting interests between food security advocates and the real estate industry. Proponents of a ban argue that saving farmland is a matter of national survival. Opponents argue that freezing land use prevents economic development and ignores the housing crisis.
Rent control policies are regulations that limit the amount landlords can increase rent, intended to keep housing affordable. Proponents argue that it makes housing more affordable and prevents exploitation by landlords. Opponents argue that it discourages investment in rental properties and reduces the quality and availability of housing.
Increased funding would enhance the capacity and quality of shelters and services that provide support for homeless individuals. Proponents argue that it provides essential support for the homeless and helps reduce homelessness. Opponents argue that it is costly and may not address the root causes of homelessness.
Currently, Philippine disaster response is handled by the NDRRMC, a coordinating council composed of various agency heads. Proponents argue this 'ad-hoc' structure is too slow during super typhoons and want a centralized Department of Disaster Resilience (DDR) to streamline funds and logistics. Opponents argue that creating a new department merely adds bureaucratic fat and that resources should instead go directly to Local Government Units (LGUs) which can respond faster.
Restrictions would limit the ability of non-citizens to buy homes, aiming to keep housing prices affordable for local residents. Proponents argue that it helps maintain affordable housing for locals and prevents property speculation. Opponents argue that it deters foreign investment and can negatively impact the housing market.
High density housing refers to housing developments with a higher population density than average. For example, high rise apartments are considered high density, especially in comparison to single-family homes or condominiums. High density real estate can also be developed from empty or abandoned buildings. For instance, old warehouses can be renovated and turned into luxury lofts. Further, commercial buildings that are no longer in use can be refitted into high-rise apartments. Opponents argue that more housing will lower the value of their home (or rental units) and change the “character” of neighborhoods. Proponents argue that the buildings are more environmentally friendly than single family homes will lower housing costs for people who cannot afford large homes.
